You can sponsor this page

Hemibagrus hoevenii (Bleeker, 1846)

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Hemibagrus hoevenii
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Bagridae.

Classification / Names Common names | Synonyms | Catalog of Fishes(genus, species) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei (teleosts) > Siluriformes (Catfishes) > Bagridae (Bagrid catfishes)
Etymology: Hemibagrus: Greek, hemi = the half + Mozarabic, bagre, Greek, pagros = a fish, Dentex sp. (Ref. 45335).
Eponymy: Dr Jan van der Hoeven (1801–1868) was a Dutch zoologist and physician who took degrees in physics (1822) and medicine (1824) at Leiden University, then practised as a physician (1824–1826). [...] (Ref. 128868), visit book page.
More on author: Bleeker.

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecology

Freshwater; brackish; demersal. Tropical

Distribution Countries | FAO areas | Ecosystems | Occurrences | Point map | Introductions | Faunafri

Asia: Java, Sumatra, Borneo and Malay Peninsula.

Size / Weight / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 35.0 cm SL male/unsexed; (Ref. 37837)

Short description Identification keys | Morphology | Morphometrics

Easily distinguished from H. nemurus by the shape and coloration of the caudal, adipose, dorsal and anal fins, the shape of the snout, occipital process and body. Has broad and conspicuous black margin all around the caudal fin (versus the fin has at most a dark narrow posterior margin), the fin is more deeply notched, the two lobes are very long and narrow, the lower lobe is about 3.5-4.0 times longer than the median rays (versus the lobes are broader and shorter, the lower one being about 2.0-2.5 times longer than the median rays), and the upper lobe regularly tapers (versus the upper lobe is somewhat rounded posteriorly, with the upper simple principal rays produced into a filament). The adipose fin is shorter, its base is included about 1.5-2.0 times into the distance between the posterior extremity of the dorsal base and the adipose origin (versus about 1.0-1.5 times in H. nemurus). Dorsal fin has a more slender appearance; membranes between the rays are narrower so that the fin has a more triangular appearance. The last branched ray is about 2-3 times in the length of the first branched rays (versus about 1.5-2.0 times) and the dorsal spine is about 2.5 times in the predorsal length (versus about 3 times) and about equal to distance between head and dorsal base (versus shorter). The anal fin is triangular (versus rounded); the snout is more protruding and most of the tooth band on the upper jaw is exposed (versus only part of it is exposed in H. nemurus); the occipital process is either visible or at least can be felt through the skin and muscles to the dorsal fin origin. The posterior part is deeply buried in the muscles and cannot be felt); and the female genital papilla is relatively longer (reaching anal origin, versus not reaching) (Ref. 37837).

Biology     Glossary (e.g. epibenthic)

Appears to be found only in the lower reaches and estuaries of large rivers (Ref. 40801).

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturity | Reproduction | Spawning | Eggs | Fecundity | Larvae

Main reference Upload your references | References | Coordinator | Collaborators

Kottelat, M. and K.K.P. Lim, 1995. Hemibagrus hoevenii, a valid species of sundaic catfish (Teleostei: Bagridae). Malay. Nat. J. 49:41-47. (Ref. 37837)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435: Version 2024-2)

  Least Concern (LC) ; Date assessed: 01 September 2018

CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

More information

Trophic ecology
Food items
Diet composition
Food consumption
Food rations
Predators
Ecology
Ecology
Population dynamics
Growth parameters
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversion
Recruitment
Abundance
Life cycle
Reproduction
Maturity
Maturity/Gills rel.
Fecundity
Spawning
Spawning aggregations
Eggs
Egg development
Larvae
Larval dynamics
Distribution
Countries
FAO areas
Ecosystems
Occurrences
Introductions
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill area
Brain
Otolith
Physiology
Body composition
Nutrients
Oxygen consumption
Swimming type
Swimming speed
Visual pigments
Fish sound
Diseases & Parasites
Toxicity (LC50s)
Genetics
Genetics
Heterozygosity
Heritability
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Aquaculture profiles
Strains
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Collaborators
Taxonomy
Common names
Synonyms
Morphology
Morphometrics
Pictures
References
References

Tools

Special reports

Download XML

Internet sources

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: genus, species | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Tree of Life | Wikipedia: Go, Search | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoological Record

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = 0.5000   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.01023 (0.00402 - 0.02604), b=2.95 (2.72 - 3.18), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Trophic level (Ref. 69278):  3.5   ±0.6 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resilience (Ref. 120179):  Medium, minimum population doubling time 1.4 - 4.4 years (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low to moderate vulnerability (33 of 100).