Morphology Data of Alburnus doriae
Identification keys
Abnormalities
Main Ref. Mohammadian-Kalat, T., H.R. Esmaeili, M. Aliabadian and J. Freyhof, 2017
Appearance refers to
Bones in OsteoBase

Sex attributes

Specialized organs
Different appearance
Different colors
Remarks

Descriptive characteristics of juvenile and adult

Striking features
Body shape lateral
Cross section oval
Dorsal head profile
Type of eyes
Type of mouth/snout
Position of mouth
Type of scales
Diagnosis

This species is distinguished from all its congeners in Iran and the wider Euphrates and Tigris drainage by the following characters, none of which are unique: superficially similar to A. atropatenae (from the endorheic Lake Urmia basin) but differs by having usually (12) 13-17 (18) gill rakers on the first branchial arch (vs. usually (10) 11-13 (15)); both A. doriae and A. atropatenae have a mid-lateral stripe between the head and the caudal-fin base, but in A. doriae, this stripe is diluted with hazy borders anterior to the dorsal-fin base (vs. with sharp borders along all its length); differs from A. filippii from the Caspian Sea basin by having usually 8½ branched dorsal-fin ray (vs. 7½) and the ventral keel between the pelvic-fin base and the anus fully covered by scales (vs. ventral keel entirely naked or naked part extends more than 50% of the distance between the pelvic-fin origin and the anus); differs from A. hohenackeri (from the Caspian Sea basin in being invasive in the Tigris drainage) by having fewer gill rakers 12-18 (vs. 18-25) and branched anal-fin rays 9-12½, mode 11½ (vs. 12-16½, mode 13½); differs from A. caeruleus (from the Qweik, Euphrates and Tigris drainages) by having fewer branched anal-fin rays 9-12½ (vs. 13-18½), more gill rakers on the first gill arch 12-18, usually 14-15 (vs. 9-13) and a more slender body, body depth at dorsal-fin origin 20-25% (vs. 26-31% SL); differs from A. sellal (from the Qweik, Euphrates and Tigris drainages) and A. zagrosensis (from headwaters of the Karun River) by having fewer scales along the lateral line 44-56 (vs. 62-86 in A. sellal and 67-83 in A. zagrosensis), fewer scale rows between the dorsal-fin origin and the lateral line 8-12 (vs. 12-19 in A. sellal and 13-15 in A. zagrosensis) and fewer scale rows between the lateral line and the pelvic-fin origin 2-5 (vs. 4-7 in A. sellal and A. zagrosensis); differs from A. heckeli (from Lake Hazar in Turkey) by having fewer lateral-line scales 44-56 (vs. 82-93), fewer gill rakers 12-18 (vs. 19-26) and fewer branched anal-fin rays 9-12½, usually 10-11½ (vs. 12-14½, usually 13½); differs from A. tarichi (from Lake Van in Turkey) by having fewer gill rakers 12-18 (vs. 21-29); differs from A. timarensis (from the Lake Van basin) by having fewer lateral-line scales 44-56 (vs. usually 54-65); differs from A. selcuklui (from the upper Tigris) by having fewer lateral-line scales (44-56 vs. 70-80), scales between lateral line and dorsal-fin origin 8-12 (vs. 13-18) and scales between the lateral line and the pelvic-fin origin 2-5, mode 4 (vs. 5-7, mode 6) (Ref. 116542).

Ease of Identification

Meristic characteristics of Alburnus doriae

Lateral Lines Interrupted: No
Scales on lateral line 44 - 56
Pored lateral line scales
Scales in lateral series
Scale rows above lateral line
Scale rows below lateral line
Scales around caudal peduncle
Barbels
Gill clefts (sharks/rays only)
Gill rakers
on lower limb
on upper limb
total 12 - 18
Vertebrae
preanal
total

Fins

Dorsal fin(s)

Attributes
Fins number
Finlets No. Dorsal   
Ventral  
Spines total
Soft-rays total
Adipose fin

Caudal fin

Attributes

Anal fin(s)

Fins number
Spines total
Soft-rays total

Paired fins

Pectoral Attributes  
Spines     
Soft-rays   
Pelvics Attributes  
Position    
Spines     
Soft-rays   
Back to Search
Comments & Corrections
cfm script by eagbayani, 17.10.00, php script by rolavides, 13/03/08 ,  last modified by sortiz, 06.27.17